So, eyes draw attention. But eyes also guide attention. We (or at least most of us) are naturally interested in what other people are interested in.
For instance in the image to the left, chances are high that your gaze initially tracks to Sophia Loren's eyes, and then with her gaze, with a goal of finding what captured her attention. Though fortuitous here, thoughtful composition drives viewers' movement through the composition... and in some cases out of the frame and toward the next desired element.
Consider the images below. In the first case, the model's arresting gaze draws YOU in – personally. In the second, her gaze drives you toward the target product – but at the expense of failing to create that personal connection.
Is one composition more effective? There is certainly emotional power in the direct eye contact. It’s personal. But the real question is this: where do people's eyes go once they break that eye contact? After all, making a connection is not valuable unless viewers also make the connection with the brand. So to be effective, an image needs to draw people in but also to drive them to look towards the thing being touted.
Eye tracking provides an easy, objective way to sort this out.
Eyetracking studies capture where people look, how they move (visually) through a page, and how long they linger on the various spots. (For websites studies, they can also capture mouse movement and clicks.)
Results are often conveyed in "heatmaps" overlaid on the original image. Hotspots (the red ones) on the heatmap define where people looked most, lingered and looked most often.
Provided the eyetracking analysis, the effective image is easy to pick out. When the woman looks at us, we tend to look at the woman and the tagline and ignore the product. When the woman looks at the product, we tend to look at the woman, the tag line and – most critical for the advertiser – the product.
Look at THAT. Composition matters |
