Quick ‚Äď tell me why you bought that unfamiliar German wine!
Chances are, you many not even be aware of what went into your decision. But hold on, you say! You're a very rational shopper, and you're certain you can explain EXACTLY why you made each purchase decision.
Timothy Wilson, in his book, Strangers to Ourselves: Discovering the Adaptive Unconscious, asserts that it's the unaware part of our mind that assembles, interprets, and assesses information and our emotions. We are unable to accurately express why we do something or even how we felt about it. In fact, if asked, we are liable to "concoct" explanations we think will seem to be ‚Äď even to ourselves ‚Äď the most logical, plausible and reasonable. We start "sense-making." In other words, we think up a coherent story in hindsight that turns out to be more of an extrapolated rationalization than a revelation of our true unconscious reasoning. By definition, we don't have access to the "unconscious" part of our consciousness. However, it CAN be observed and measured. How? By looking at our behaviors, rather than asking us about our thoughts and opinions.
How does this work for consumers and shopping? We can learn more about what influences consumers' purchasing decisions by looking at their actions ‚Äď instead of trying to get them to tell us what they were thinking about.
Dijksterhuis, Smith, van Baaren and Wigboldus (2005) assert that you can't describe your thinking process if you haven't engaged in one in the first place.
So, just how do we go about measuring something that, by its very nature, is not at the level of consciousness? Fortunately, a variety of interesting and novel experiments have been conducted on this very topic. And the results are compelling.
It is well known that activating particular stereotypes or traits can trigger related observable behaviors: people can be led to be more intelligent or unintelligent, aggressive or helpful, cooperative or competitive, friendly or unfriendly, etc. This indicates that people adjust their behaviors to match that of their immediate social environment ‚Äď and they're not even conscious of it.
Words: (The pen is mightier than we knew.) During a scrambled sentence task, Bargh, Chen, and Burrows (1996) primed some participants by exposing them to words related to a stereotype of older people, e.g., gray, bingo, Florida. After the session, those participants primed with the concept of older people walked significantly slower to the elevator than those in the control group.
Actions: (Do as I do and I'll like you more.) Participants who weren't aware they were being imitated by confederates of the researchers ended up liking the confederates more than those participants who were not imitated during the experiment, conducted by Chartrand and Bargh (1999). Therefore, the imitation led to an increase in liking the interaction partner.
Visuals: (Shhh! It's a library.) After looking at an image of a particular environment, such as a library or an upscale restaurant, participants spontaneously started to whisper at the conclusion of the experiment since they were under the impression that they were actually going to go to a library. So the behavior goals became activated automatically. (Aarts and Dijksterhuis, 2003)
Thoughts: (Mom and Dad always said to try your best.) Primed with thoughts of their mothers (Fitszsimons and Bargh, 2003), or fathers (Shah, 2003), participants tried harder to succeed on a task relative to the other participants in an experiment.
Sounds: (What kind of music is that to my ears?) North, Shilcock, and Hargreaves (2003) showed that restaurant customers spent more money when classical music was played in the background, but spent significantly less when either pop music or no music was played.
Smells: (I have a strange urge to do housework!) A bucket with warm water and citrus-scented cleanser was hidden by researchers Holland, Hendriks, and Aarts (2005) in their laboratory during some of their experiments. Participants who were unconsciously primed with the cleanser listed more cleaning-related activities for what they wanted to engage in later that day.
The bottom line is that it may take only the mere perception of cues in an environment to affect a person's unconscious behavior.
We'd like to believe that our conscious mind is always in charge. But perhaps the uncomfortable reality is that our unconscious is responsible for taking the lead more often than we'd care to admit (even if we did know about it, which we don't!).
The good news for organizations is that their challenge of trying to establish trust and credibility with consumers might have gotten just a little bit easier. Look at it this way: if an organization selects specific wording, carefully chooses the images displayed, and effectively manages the screen real estate on their Web site, then they stand a better chance of making an unconscious connection with the consumer.
And the bricks and mortar stores who thoughtfully assemble their product displays, background music, and room scent have put multiple factors in their favor for stimulating shoppers to make a purchase, even if their efforts only offer subtle cues.
This probably isn't new at all to savvy managers. But knowing that there's research to back up this strategy might make it easier for organizations and usability professionals to advocate that text and visuals, as well as the entire environment, receive a good deal of scrutiny to assure that they are communicating the desired message to consumers
Deciding which oven mitt to buy? Then go ahead and give it more thought. Parting from your precious dollars to purchase a car? Worse yet, a house??? You'd better sleep on it first!
Bottom Line: Next time you need to make a complicated decision ‚Äď stop thinking.
Difficult decisions are best left to our unconscious minds. In fact, a new study shows that thinking too hard about a problem could lead to poor choices and expensive errors. The unconscious mind, on the other hand, seems much better-suited to weighing the options and making the optimal decision.
Dijksterhuis, Bos, Nordgren, and van Baaren (2005) investigated people making simple and complex decisions regarding items such as cars, furniture, shampoos, oven mitts and other items. Participants were provided with information and then asked to make a purchase decision.
In one test, half the participants were asked to decide directly after receiving the information; the other half was given a series of puzzles before being asked to decide.
When the choices were simple, such as oven mitts or shampoo, participants made better decisions when they consciously deliberated, i.e., when their conscious thought was uninterrupted.
But for decisions on more complex items, such as a house, users who engaged in too much conscious deliberation made incorrect choices. However, participants whose conscious minds were pre-occupied with the puzzles before deciding made better decisions. Their unconscious was free to consider all the information and make the right choice.
Given the hectic pace of life, we're actually fortunate that our unconscious minds are so efficient, processing and analyzing an array of things at once for us. Granted, one disadvantage is that not all of our decision-making is under our conscious control. But there's been a trade-off for the sake of efficiency.
This is especially true in the online environment where decisions are made in split seconds. Is the site professional looking? Is it easy to use? Does it seem trustworthy?
So many factors go into our decision-making process when we shop online, yet we're typically unaware of them. When using the Internet, we're often so task-focused that we'd be hard-pressed to describe in any detail what we were thinking about at the time.
Sure, we might have a fleeting awareness of our thoughts about a company's brand (Yeah, they had good products and fast shipping the last time, and Mom loved her gift!). But our unconscious is running full speed in evaluating the layout, the words, their tone, the photos, etc.
Hmm, so how can we, as members of the usability community, make sense of all this?
Therefore, the next time you're browsing for some wine in your local store and find that you placed an unfamiliar German wine in your cart, try to stop and listen to the background music. Odds are that you were influenced by the German music being played in the store.
A post-purchase interview probably wouldn't yield a lot of insight since you really weren't aware of the background music at the time. But your actions created a clear signal. And this is what CAN be measured!
Aarts, H. and Dijksterhuis, A. (2003). The silence of the library: Environment, situational norm, and social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 18-28.
Bargh, J.A., Chen, M., and Burrows, L. (1996). The automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait concept and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230-244.
Chartrand, T.L. and Bargh, J.A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893-910.
Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M., Nordgren, L., and van Baaren, R.B.(2005) On Making the Right Choice: The Deliberation-Without-Attention Effect. Science, 311 (5763), 1005-1007.
Dijksterhuis, A., Smith, P.K., van Baaren, R.B., and Wigboldus, D.H.J. (2005). The Unconscious Consumer: Effects of Environment on Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15 (3), 193-202.
Holland, R.W., Hendriks, M., and Aarts, H. (2005). Smells like clean spirit: Nonconscious effects of scent on cognition and behavior. Psychological Science, 16 (9), 689-693.
Littler, D. and Melanthiou, D. (2006). Consumer perceptions of risk and uncertainty and the implications for behaviour towards innovative retail services: The case of Internet Banking. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 13(6), 431-443.
North, A., Shilcock, A., and Hargreaves D.J.¬† (2003)¬† The Effect of Musical Style on Restaurant Consumers' Spending, Environment & Behavior, 35(5), 712-718
Riegelsberger, J., Sasse, M. A., and McCarthy, J. D. (2005). The mechanics of trust: A framework for research and design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62, 381-422.
Shah, J.Y. (2003). Automatic for the people: How representations of significant others implicitly affect goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 661-681.
Wilson, T. (2002). Strangers to Ourselves: Discovering the Adaptive Unconscious. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
While it may be possible that the subconscious mind plays a role, the word "unconscious" by definition means that it is not aware at all and therefore cannot play a role in decisions.
Even to the extent that the subconscious is involved, it does not consist of something separate and mystical apart from the conscious mind. The subconscious consists of conscious decisions that are automated.
In the case of the German wine, if you had had German wine before and despised it, it would be in the realm of your consciousness and no amount of German music would make you consider it.
Excellent information !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Closely related (but approaching it from another point of view): the "top ten" book of Barry Schwarz "The Paradox of Choice" ‚Äď a must-read for those interested in choice and decision.
In the section "So who's really in charge here?", I can recall tons of stores that use this method. McDonald's; having the inside unappealing to the customer so they will not stay, making it the "get and go" environment they seek. Americus Diamond; I can't walk in there without feeling the romance due to the music which results in me buying something for my girlfriend :O!
Businesses also tend to use the state-dependent memory method. Businesses will have an advertisement of happiness which tends to bring back memories of times when we were happy. A good example of this might be Kodak. The way they have brought the "Kodak moment" to people. The information you guys provided was very insightful ‚Äď thanks!
p.s. I can explain EXACTLY why I made each purchase decision... I am a teen, who will eat anything/everything. :)
Sign up to get our Newsletter delivered straight to your inbox
HFI may use ‚Äúcookies‚ÄĚ or ‚Äúweb beacons‚ÄĚ to track how Users use the Website. A cookie is a piece of software that a web server can store on Users‚Äô PCs and use to identify Users should they visit the Website again. Users may adjust their web browser software if they do not wish to accept cookies. To withdraw your consent after accepting a cookie, delete the cookie from your computer.
HFI believes that every User should know how it utilizes the information collected from Users. The Website is not directed at children under 13 years of age, and HFI does not knowingly collect personally identifiable information from children under 13 years of age online. Please note that the Website may contain links to other websites. These linked sites may not be operated or controlled by HFI. HFI is not responsible for the privacy practices of these or any other websites, and you access these websites entirely at your own risk. HFI recommends that you review the privacy practices of any other websites that you choose to visit.
HFI is based, and this website is hosted, in the United States of America. If User is from the European Union or other regions of the world with laws governing data collection and use that may differ from U.S. law and User is registering an account on the Website, visiting the Website, purchasing products or services from HFI or the Website, or otherwise using the Website, please note that any personally identifiable information that User provides to HFI will be transferred to the United States. Any such personally identifiable information provided will be processed and stored in the United States by HFI or a service provider acting on its behalf. By providing your personally identifiable information, User hereby specifically and expressly consents to such transfer and processing and the uses and disclosures set forth herein.
In the course of its business, HFI may perform expert reviews, usability testing, and other consulting work where personal privacy is a concern. HFI believes in the importance of protecting personal information, and may use measures to provide this protection, including, but not limited to, using consent forms for participants or ‚Äúdummy‚ÄĚ test data.
HFI may use personally identifiable information collected through the Website for the specific purposes for which the information was collected, to process purchases and sales of products or services offered via the Website if any, to contact Users regarding products and services offered by HFI, its parent, subsidiary and other related companies in order to otherwise to enhance Users‚Äô experience with HFI. HFI may also use information collected through the Website for research regarding the effectiveness of the Website and the business planning, marketing, advertising and sales efforts of HFI. HFI does not sell any User information under any circumstances.
HFI may disclose personally identifiable information collected from Users to its parent, subsidiary and other related companies to use the information for the purposes outlined above, as necessary to provide the services offered by HFI and to provide the Website itself, and for the specific purposes for which the information was collected. HFI may disclose personally identifiable information at the request of law enforcement or governmental agencies or in response to subpoenas, court orders or other legal process, to establish, protect or exercise HFI‚Äôs legal or other rights or to defend against a legal claim or as otherwise required or allowed by law. HFI may disclose personally identifiable information in order to protect the rights, property or safety of a User or any other person. HFI may disclose personally identifiable information to investigate or prevent a violation by User of any contractual or other relationship with HFI or the perpetration of any illegal or harmful activity. HFI may also disclose aggregate, anonymous data based on information collected from Users to investors and potential partners. Finally, HFI may disclose or transfer personally identifiable information collected from Users in connection with or in contemplation of a sale of its assets or business or a merger, consolidation or other reorganization of its business.
If a User includes such User‚Äôs personally identifiable information as part of the User posting to the Website, such information may be made available to any parties using the Website. HFI does not edit or otherwise remove such information from User information before it is posted on the Website. If a User does not wish to have such User‚Äôs personally identifiable information made available in this manner, such User must remove any such information before posting. HFI is not liable for any damages caused or incurred due to personally identifiable information made available in the foregoing manners. For example, a User posts on an HFI-administered forum would be considered Personal Information as provided by User and subject to the terms of this section.
Information about Users that is maintained on HFI‚Äôs systems or those of its service providers is protected using industry standard security measures. However, no security measures are perfect or impenetrable, and HFI cannot guarantee that the information submitted to, maintained on or transmitted from its systems will be completely secure. HFI is not responsible for the circumvention of any privacy settings or security measures relating to the Website by any Users or third parties.
Human Factors International, Inc.
PO Box 2020
1680 highway 1, STE 3600
Fairfield IA 52556
HFI reserves the right to cancel any course up to 14 (fourteen) days prior to the first day of the course. Registrants will be promptly notified and will receive a full refund or be transferred to the equivalent class of their choice within a 12-month period. HFI is not responsible for travel expenses or any costs that may be incurred as a result of cancellations.
$100 processing fee if cancelling within two weeks of course start date.
4 Pack + Exam registration: Rs. 10,000 per participant processing fee (to be paid by the participant) if cancelling or transferring the course (4 Pack-CUA/CXA) registration before three weeks from the course start date. No refund or carry forward of the course fees if cancelling or transferring the course registration within three weeks before the course start date.
Individual Modules: Rs. 3,000 per participant ‚Äėper module‚Äô processing fee (to be paid by the participant) if cancelling or transferring the course (any Individual HFI course) registration before three weeks from the course start date. No refund or carry forward of the course fees if cancelling or transferring the course registration within three weeks before the course start date.
Exam: Rs. 3,000 per participant processing fee (to be paid by the participant) if cancelling or transferring the pre agreed CUA/CXA exam date before three weeks from the examination date. No refund or carry forward of the exam fees if requesting/cancelling or transferring the CUA/CXA exam within three weeks before the examination date.
There will be no audio or video recording allowed in class. Students who have any disability that might affect their performance in this class are encouraged to speak with the instructor at the beginning of the class.
The course and training materials and all other handouts provided by HFI during the course are published, copyrighted works proprietary and owned exclusively by HFI. The course participant does not acquire title nor ownership rights in any of these materials. Further the course participant agrees not to reproduce, modify, and/or convert to electronic format (i.e., softcopy) any of the materials received from or provided by HFI. The materials provided in the class are for the sole use of the class participant. HFI does not provide the materials in electronic format to the participants in public or onsite courses.